Dosimetric Impact of Deformable Image Registration versus Simple Summation in Multi-Fraction HDR Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer under Standard Protocol
Abstract
Objective: In high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer, cumulative dose is commonly estimated using simple summation (SS) of dose–volume histogram parameters, assuming high-dose regions remain spatially consistent across fractions. Deformable image registration (DIR) offers an alternative approach that accounts for interfractional anatomical variations. This study compared the dosimetric outcomes of SS and DIR under standardized clinical protocols.
Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 54 patients with cervical cancer treated with four-fraction intracavitary brachytherapy using standardized applicators and a bladder-filling protocol with CT-based planning. Cumulative doses to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, and rectum were calculated using both SS and DIR, aligned using applicator geometry. DIR accuracy was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Jaccard Index.
Results: DIR yielded significantly lower accumulated HR-CTV doses across all the evaluated parameters (percentage differences were 8.2%, 6.0%, and 3.7% for D98, D90, and D50, respectively; all p-value<0.001) compared with SS, with moderate geometric agreement (DSC=0.72). For organs at risk, dose differences for the bladder and rectum were not statistically significant. Rectal geometric agreement was limited (DSC=0.60), whereas bladder agreement was good (DSC=0.89), likely influenced by the controlled bladder-filling protocol.
Conclusion: DIR-based dose accumulation resulted in significantly lower HR-CTV dose estimates compared with SS, while dose differences for the bladder and rectum remained minimal. Geometric reliability varied across anatomical structures. Future research should correlate DIR-based dosimetry with clinical outcomes to support anatomically adaptive brachytherapy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Suzumura EA, Gama LM, Jahn B, Campolina AG, Carvalho HDA, De Soárez PC. Effects of 3D image-guided brachytherapy compared to 2D conventional brachytherapy on clinical outcomes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Brachytherapy 2021;20:710–37.
Hande V, Chopra S, Kalra B, Abdel-Wahab M, Kannan S, Tanderup K, et al. Point-A vs. volume-based brachytherapy for the treatment of cervix cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2022;170:70–8.
Viswanathan AN, Thomadsen B. American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: General principles. Brachytherapy 2012;11:33–46.
Zakariaee R, Hamarneh G, Brown CJ, Gaudet M, Aquino-Parsons C, Spadinger I. Bladder accumulated dose in image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer and its relation to urinary toxicity. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:8408–24.
Rigaud B, Simon A, Castelli J, Lafond C, Acosta O, Haigron P, et al. Deformable image registration for radiation therapy: principle, methods, applications and evaluation. Acta Oncol 2019;58:1225–37.
Reniers B, Janssens G, Orban De Xivry J, Landry G, Verhaegen F. Dose distribution for gynecological brachytherapy with dose accumulation between insertions: feasibility study. Brachytherapy 2016;15:504–13.
Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys 2017;44:e43–76.
Mee M, Stewart K, Lathouras M, Truong H, Hargrave C. Evaluation of a deformable image registration quality assurance tool for head and neck cancer patients. J Med Radiat Sci 2020;67:284–93.
Flower E, Do V, Sykes J, Dempsey C, Holloway L, Summerhayes K, et al. Deformable image registration for cervical cancer brachytherapy dose accumulation: organ at risk dose–volume histogram parameter reproducibility and anatomic position stability. Brachytherapy 2017;16:387–92.
Andersen ES, Noe KØ, Sørensen TS, Nielsen SK, Fokdal L, Paludan M, et al. Simple DVH parameter addition as compared to deformable registration for bladder dose accumulation in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2013;107:52–7.
Kim H, Lee YC, Benedict SH, Dyer B, Price M, Rong Y, et al. Dose Summation strategies for external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy in gynecologic malignancy: a review from the NRG Oncology and NCTN medical physics subcommittees. Int J Radiat Oncol 2021;111:999–1010.
Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005;74:235–45.
Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, De Leeuw A, Kirchheiner K, Nout R, et al. The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018;9:48–60.
8. Dose and volume parameters for prescribing, recording, and reporting brachytherapy, alone and combined with external-beam radiotherapy. J ICRU 2013;13:105–22.
Zhao T, Chen Y, Qiu B, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhang X, et al. Evaluating the accumulated dose distribution of organs at risk in combined radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma based on deformable image registration. Brachytherapy 2023;22:174–80.
Abe T, Tamaki T, Makino S, Ebara T, Hirai R, Miyaura K, et al. Assessing cumulative dose distributions in combined radiotherapy for cervical cancer using deformable image registration with pre-imaging preparations. Radiat Oncol 2014;9:293.
Teo BK, Bonner Millar LP, Ding X, Lin LL. Assessment of cumulative external beam and intracavitary brachytherapy organ doses in gynecologic cancers using deformable dose summation. Radiother Oncol 2015;115:195–202.
Jamema SV, Mahantshetty U, Andersen E, Noe KØ, Sørensen TS, Kallehauge JF, et al. Uncertainties of deformable image registration for dose accumulation of high-dose regions in bladder and rectum in locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2015;14:953–62.
Nie K, Pouliot J, Smith E, Chuang C. Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy — how should we evaluate and interpret the result? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17:328–40.
Hussein M, Akintonde A, McClelland J, Speight R, Clark CH. Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools. Br J Radiol 2021;94:20210001.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.