Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Vol 44, No 5 (2026): Sep-Oct > Jiaranai

Outcomes of Nasalance Scores in Children with Cochlear Implants in Ramathibodi Hospital

Tidajun Jiaranai, Tossaporn Opassereepadung

Abstract

Objective: The study compared the nasalance scores of Thai children with cochlear implants in Ramathibodi Hospital with normative data.
Material and Methods: From August 2021 to December 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Ramathibodi Hospital. The participants were 20 children, ranging in age from 6.10 to 14.1 years, with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who received cochlear implants and were evaluated for nasalance using the Nasometer. They were instructed to read three standard Thai passages for nasalance assessment. Descriptive statistics and a sample t-test were employed to compare the nasalance scores with normative data.
Results: A significant difference in the mean nasalance scores between the Thai children with cochlear implants and the normative data for the oral passage in all three age groups. Furthermore, only the 12.1 to 15.0 age range in the nasal passage showed a significant difference in mean nasalance scores compared to the normative data. However, the remaining age of the nasal and oro-nasal passage showed no significant differences between the mean nasalance scores compared to the normative data (p-value<0.05).
Conclusion: Children with cochlear implants may have improved nasalance scores. Their scores were still higher than those of children with normal hearing, suggesting that even after cochlear implants are fitted, speech therapy is still necessary to rehabilitate nasal resonance in children with hearing impairment.

 Keywords

cochlear implant; hearing impairment; nasalance scores

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Lieu JEC, Kenna M, Anne S, Davidson L. Hearing loss in children. JAMA 2020;324:2195-205.

John SE, Cherian CS, Koshy SM. Associated health problems in children with hearing impairment: an institutional study. Int J Contemp Pediatr 2021;8:699-705.

Hassan SM, Malki KH, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari M, Murry T. The effect of cochlear implantation on nasalance of speech in postlingually hearing-impaired adults. J Voice 2012;26:669.

St John M, Columbus G, Brignell A, Carew P, Skeat J, Reilly S, et al. Predicting speech-sound disorder outcomes in school-age children with hearing loss: the VicCHILD experience. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2020;55:537–46.

Baudonck N, Van Lierde K, D’haeseleer E, Dhooge I. Nasalance and nasality in children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:541–5.

Gold T. Speech production in hearing-impaired children. J Commun Disord 1980;13:397–418.

Fletcher SG, Higgins JM. Performance of children with severe to profound auditory impairment in instrumentally guided reduction of nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Disord 1980;45:181–94.

Fletcher SG, Mahfuzh F, Hendarmin H. Nasalance in the speech of children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1999;8:241–8.

LaPine PR, Stewart MG, Tatchell J. Application of nasometry to speech samples of hearing-impaired children. Percept Mot Skills 1991;73:467–75.

Ysunza A, Vazquez MC. Velopharyngeal sphincter physiology in deaf individuals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:141–3.

Lock RB, Seaver EJ. Nasality and velopharyngeal function in five hearing impaired adults. J Commun Disord 1984;17:47–64.

Colton RH, Cooker HS. Perceived nasality in the speech of the deaf. J Speech Hear Res 1968;11:553–9.

Stevens KN, Nickerson RS, Boothroyd A, Rollins AM. Assessment of nasalization in the speech of deaf children. J Speech Hear Res 1976;19:393–416.

Samsithong R. Thai version of early speech perception test for profoundly hearing impaired children (Thai ESP) [dissertation]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2002.

Buakanok N. A study of nasalance in normal children aged 6 to 15 years in Bangkok, Thailand [thesis]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2002 [cited 2025 Apr 29]. Available from:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/107365

Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RC. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:1395–405.

Sebastian S, Sreedevi N, Lepcha A, Mathew J. Nasalance in cochlear implantees. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;8:202–5.

Evans MK, Deliyski DD. Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation. J Voice 2007;21:669–82.

Kamel N, Abdel Haleem E, Bakr M, Hassan E. Nasalance scores of Egyptian hearing impaired children. J Curr Med Res Pract 2019;4:152–7.

Nguyen LHP, Allegro J, Low A, Papsin B, Campisi P. Effect of cochlear implantation on nasality in children. Ear Nose Throat J Int 2008;87:138, 140–3.

Geal-Dor M, Tranovsky Y, Boudilovsky E, Adelman C, Adler M, Levi H. Acquisition of early auditory milestones with a cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1852–5.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20261374

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2026

About The Authors

Tidajun Jiaranai
Speech Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ratchaburi Hospital, Ratchaburi 70000,
Thailand

Tossaporn Opassereepadung
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Journal Metrics

2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%
2024 (June)
Acceptance rate: 19%
2025 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23%



Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

0.7
2025
CiteScore
 
32nd percentile
Q 3

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in








Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam adolescent anxiety children computed tomography depression diabetes mellitus elderly knowledge mental health mortality older adults prevalence quality of life reliability risk factors treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems