Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Online-first > Putsa

Effects of Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting with an Office-Based Exercise Program on Sitting Time, Physical Activity, Musculoskeletal Discomfort, and Stress in Office Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bukhari Putsa, Chutima Jalayondeja, Wattana Jalayondeja, Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh, Keerin Mekhora, Khajornyod Anuraktam, Teerapat Kansadub

Abstract

Objective: Prolonged sitting in office workplaces increases the risk of non-communicable diseases, work-related musculoskeletal disorders, and psychological health issues. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an office-based exercise program delivered via break reminder software in reducing sitting time, musculoskeletal discomfort, stress, and physical activity in office workers.
Material and Methods: A two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted over 8 weeks with 58 office workers randomized to an intervention (n=29) or control group (n=29). The intervention group received hourly prompts from break reminder software to perform 5-minute office-based exercises, while the control group continued routine work and received educational brochures on office ergonomics. Primary outcomes were sitting time, standing time, and physical activity (PA) level measured with ActiGraph™ accelerometers; musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed using the Borg CR-10 scale. Stress was a secondary outcome measured by the Suanprung Stress Test-20 (SPST-20). Data were analyzed using mixed-model ANOVA with intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches.
Results: Of 38 participants completing accelerometer assessments (intervention: n=21; control: n=17), per-protocol analysis showed a significant reduction in sitting time in the intervention group (12.8 min/8-hour workday; p-value<0.001) and increased standing time (12.6 min; p-value=0.005), with significant group-by-time interactions. Neck discomfort decreased significantly (p-value=0.001), with improvements in the shoulders and lower back. Stress scores declined in both groups, with a greater reduction in the intervention group (11.1 points; p-value<0.001).
Conclusion: The intervention effectively reduced sitting time, musculoskeletal discomfort, and stress, supporting digital prompts and structured exercises as feasible, low-cost workplace health strategies.

 Keywords

break sitting; musculoskeletal discomfort; office workers; physical activity; stress

 Full Text:

PDF

References

McCrady SK, Levine JA. Sedentariness at work: how much do we really sit? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:2103–5.

Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Owen N, et al. Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:128.

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451–62.

World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

Collins RM, Janse Van Rensburg DC, Patricios JS. Common work-related musculoskeletal strains and injuries. S Afr Fam Pract 2011;53:240–6.

Parry SP, Coenen P, Shrestha N, O’Sullivan PB, Maher CG, Straker LM. Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019.

Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Pedisic Z. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;6.

Nguyen P, Le LK-D, Nguyen D, Gao L, Dunstan DW, Moodie M. The effectiveness of sedentary behavior interventions on sitting time and screen time in children and adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020;17:117.

Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaee M, Kargarfard M, Sangelaji B, Tamrin SBM. Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts in office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2018;22:144–53.

Galinsky T, Swanson N, Sauter S, Dunkin R, Hurrell J, Schleifer L. Supplementary breaks and stretching exercises for data entry operators: a follow-up field study. Am J Ind Med 2007;50:519-27.

Wang C, Lu EY, Sun W, Chang JR, Tsang HWH. Effectiveness of interventions on sedentary behaviors in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health 2024;230:45–51.

Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:293–7.

Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. PLoS Med 2025;22.

Shephard RJ. PAR-Q, Canadian home fitness test and exercise screening alternatives. Sports Med 1988;5:185–95.

Mekhora K, Jalayondeja W, Jalayondeja C, Bhuanantanondh P, Dusadiisariyavong A, Upiriyasakul R, et al. Online self-report questionnaire on computer work-related exposure: validity and internal consistency. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97:S80–3.

Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:777–81.

Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1987;18:233–7.

Putsa B, Jalayondeja W, Mekhora K, Bhuanantanondh P, Jalayondeja C. Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2022;22:1503.

Mahatnirunkul S, Pumpaisanchai W, Tapanya P. Construction of Suan Prung stress test for the Thai population. Bull Suan Prung 1997;13:1–11.

Mantzari E, Galloway C, Wijndaele K, Brage S, Griffin SJ, Marteau TM. Impact of sit-stand desks at work on energy expenditure, sitting time and cardio-metabolic risk factors: Multiphase feasibility study with randomised controlled component. Prev Med Rep 2018;13:64-72.

Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 2005;37:379–84.

Grimaud Q, Malloggi L, Moret L, Rowe F, Fleury-Bahi G, Tripodi D. Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2025;25:1827.

Ojo SO, Chater AM, Hewson DJ, Bailey DP. Workplace productivity, health and wellbeing: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial of a workplace intervention to reduce sitting in office workers. J Occup Environ Med 2024;66:487-94.

Danquah IH, Kloster S, Holtermann A, Aadahl M, Bauman A, Ersbøll A, et al. Take a Stand!-a multi-component intervention aimed at reducing sitting time among office workers-a cluster randomized trial. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:128-40.

Parés-Salomón I, Señé-Mir AM, Martín-Bozas F, Loef B, Coffey A, Dowd KP, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2024;21:41.

Edwardson CL, Biddle SJH, Clemes SA, Davies MJ, Dunstan DW, Eborall H, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention for reducing sitting time and improving health in office workers: three arm cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2022;378:e069288.

De Cocker K, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G, Vandelanotte C. Effectiveness of a web-based computer-tailored intervention on workplace sitting: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e96.

Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Quested E, Smith BS, Nicholas J, McVeigh J, Fenton SAM, et al. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a peer-led motivationally-embellished workplace walking intervention: A pilot cluster randomized trial (the START trial). Contemp Clin Trials 2020;91:105969.

Dzakpasu FQS, Carver A, Brakenridge CJ, Cicuttini F, Urquhart DM, Owen N, et al. Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021;18:159.

Aegerter AM, Deforth M, Volken T, Johnston V, Luomajoki H, Dressel H, et al. A multi-component intervention (NEXpro) reduces neck pain-related work productivity loss: a randomized controlled trial among swiss office workers. J Occup Rehabil 2023;33:288-300.

Karatrantou K, Gerodimos V. A comprehensive workplace exercise intervention to reduce musculoskeletal pain and improve functional capacity in office workers: a randomized controlled study. Healthcare (Basel) 2024;12:915.

Johnston V, Chen X, Welch A, Sjøgaard G, Comans TA, McStea M, et al. A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain - a secondary outcome analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021;22:68.

Luger T, Maher CG, Rieger MA, Steinhilber B. Work-break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal sympto and disorders in healthy workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;7:CD012886.

Nakphet N, Chaikumarn M, Janwantanakul P. Effect of different types of rest-break interventions on neck and shoulder muscle activity, perceived discomfort and productivity in symptomatic VDU operators: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2014;20:339-53.

Gram B, Andersen C, Zebis MK, Bredahl T, Pedersen MT, Mortensen OS, et al. Effect of training supervision on effectiveness of strength training for reducing neck/shoulder pain and headache in office workers: cluster randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:693013.

Pereira M, Comans T, Sjøgaard G, Straker L, Melloh M, O’Leary S, et al. Workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus health promotion for office worker productivity: a cluster-randomized trial. Scand J Work Environ Health 2019;45:42–52.

Barr AE, Barbe MF. Pathophysiological tissue changes associated with repetitive movement: a review of the evidence. Phys Ther 2002;82:173–87.

Abdin S, Welch RK, Byron-Daniel J, Meyrick J. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in improving well-being across office-based workplace settings: a systematic review. Public Health 2018;160:70-6.

Edwardson CL, Maylor BD, Biddle SJ, Clemes SA, Cox E, Davies MJ, et al. A multicomponent intervention to reduce daily sitting time in office workers: the SMART Work & Life three-arm cluster RCT. Public Health Res 2023;11:1-229.

Park S, Jang MK. Associations between workplace exercise interventions and job stress reduction: a systematic review. Workplace Health Saf 2019;67:592-601.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20261389

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2026

About The Authors

Bukhari Putsa
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Chutima Jalayondeja
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Wattana Jalayondeja
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Keerin Mekhora
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Khajornyod Anuraktam
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Teerapat Kansadub
Data Governance and Strategic Intelligence (DGSI), Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170,
Thailand

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Journal Metrics

2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%
2024 (June)
Acceptance rate: 19%
2025 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23%



Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

0.7
2025
CiteScore
 
32nd percentile
Q 3

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in








Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam adolescent children computed tomography depression diabetes diabetes mellitus elderly knowledge mental health mortality older adults prevalence quality of life reliability risk factors treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems