Anion Gap is a Predictor of Elevated Serum Lactate in Patients Diagnosed with Sepsis without Shock in the Emergency Department
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether high anion gap levels predict increased serum lactate >2 mmol/L, and to determine the best AG cut-off point for predicting serum lactate levels greater than 2 mmol/L and greater than 4 mmol/L.
Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study among patients with sepsis without shock admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care, university hospital. Anion gap and serum lactate were collected. Patients’ baseline characteristics and laboratory results were also incorporated to calculate the Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Analysis of diagnostic accuracy and Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) was used to demonstrate the appropriate cut-off point of the anion gap for predicting serum lactate >2 mmol/L.
Results: The study included 236 patients. Anion gap >12 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 93.3% (95%CI 88.2-96.6%) and a specificity of 13.7% (95%CI 6.8-23.8%) for predicting serum lactate >2 mmol/L. There was poor discriminative performance of the anion gap to predict serum lactate >2 mmol/L (area under ROC is 0.65; 95%CI 0.58-0.72). In contrast, there was good discriminative performance of the anion gap to predict serum lactate >4 mmol/L (area under ROC 0.83; 95%CI 0.77-0.88). The optimal cut-off point was anion gap > 18 mmol/L, which was good for predicting serum lactate >4 mmol/L.
Conclusion: An anion gap >12 mmol/L is not suitable for assessing lactate >2 mmol/L; however, an anion gap >18 mmol/L can predict serum lactate >4 mmol/L in patients with sepsis who had mean arterial pressure (MAP) >65 mmHg.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
World Health Organisation. Sepsis [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sepsis
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet 2020;395:200–11.
Andersson M, Östholm-Balkhed Å, Fredrikson M, Holmbom M, Hällgren A, Berg S, et al. Delay of appropriate antibiotic treatment is associated with high mortality in patients with community-onset sepsis in a Swedish setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;38:1223–34.
Neilson HK, Fortier JH, Finestone PJ, Ogilby CM, Liu R, Bridges EJ, et al. Diagnostic Delays in Sepsis: Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Study of Canadian Medico-Legal Claims. Crit Care Explor 2023;5:e0841.
Laupland KB, Zygun DA, Doig CJ, Bagshaw SM, Svenson LW, Fick GH. One-year mortality of bloodstream infection-associated sepsis and septic shock among patients presenting to a regional critical care system. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:213–9.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801.
Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Heffner AC, Kline JA, Jones AE. Outcomes of patients undergoing early sepsis resuscitation for cryptic shock compared with overt shock. Resuscitation 2011;82:1289–93.
Ranzani OT, Monteiro MB, Ferreira EM, Santos SR, Machado FR, Noritomi DT. Reclassifying the spectrum of septic patients using lactate: severe sepsis, cryptic shock, vasoplegic shock and dysoxic shock. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2013;25. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130047.
Emanuel R, Bryant N, Suzanne H, Julie R, Alexandria M, Bernhard K, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;10.
Puskarich MA, Illich BM, Jones AE. Prognosis of emergency department patients with suspected infection and intermediate lactate levels: a systematic review. J Crit Care 2014;29:334–9.
Kelen GD, Cline DM. Acid-Base Disorders. In: Tintinalli’s emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2020:p.73.
Ganesh K, Sharma R, Varghese J, Pillai MGK. A profile of metabolic acidosis in patients with sepsis in an intensive care unit setting. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016;6:178.
Chirawatkul A. Sample size calculation in studies. In: Statistics for Health Science Research. 1st ed. Bangkok: Witthayaphat; 2009;p.181–2.
Aronovich D, Trotter M, Rivera C, Dalley M, Farcy D, Betancourt M, et al. Is serum lactate necessary in patients with normal anion gap and serum bicarbonate? WestJEM 2015;16:364–6.
Pongmanee W, Vattanavanit V. Can base excess and anion gap predict lactate level in diagnosis of septic shock? OAEM. 2017;10:1–7.
Berkman M, Ufberg J, Nathanson LA, Shapiro NI. Anion gap as a screening tool for elevated lactate in patients with an increased risk of developing sepsis in the emergency department. J Emergency Med 2009;36:391–4.
Mohr NM, Vakkalanka JP, Faine BA, Skow B, Harland KK, Dick-Perez R, et al. Serum anion gap predicts lactate poorly, but may be used to identify sepsis patients at risk for death: a cohort study. J Crit Care 2018;44:223–8.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.