Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Vol 43, No 3 (2025) > Kumar

Does Harmonic Scalpel Tonsillectomy Have Better Postoperative Outcomes Than Cold Dissection Technique in Adults? Results of A Randomized Double-Masked Study

Vinay Kumar, Surendra Kumar, Sushil Kumar Sharma, Chandra Bhan, Rahul Bhargava, Jitendra Gupta

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative pain, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, time needed to return to a normal diet, and activity between harmonic scalpel and cold dissection tonsillectomies.
Material and Methods: In this prospective, double-blind study, eligible patients aged 18 and above (n=88) were randomized to receive either harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy (n=44) or cold steel tonsillectomy (n=44). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) on days 1, 4 and 7, respectively. Intraoperative bleeding was measured by intra-suction blood and the weight of tonsil swabs.
Results: On postoperative day one, the mean pain score in the harmonic scalpel group was 4.6±1.4 (range, 2-7), and in the cold steel group, it was 7.2±1.7(range, 4-10): (p-value<0.001). The mean pain score on the 7th postoperative day in the harmonic scalpel group was 2.3±1 (range, 1-4), and in the cold steel group, it was (2.6±1.3, range 1-6) (p-value=0.145). The mean intraoperative bleeding in Group 1 was 8±1.9 (range, 5-12 cubic centimeter (cc)), and in Group 2 was 66.3±8.1 (range, 58-90 cc): (p-value<0.001). The mean duration of surgery in Group 1 was 14.5±3.5 (range, 11-28 minutes) and in Group 2 was 27.4±4.4 (range, 22-38 minutes) (p-value<0.001). The mean time taken to return to resume daily activities in the case of harmonic scalpel was 7.6± 0.8 days, whereas in cases of the cold steel method it was 8.8±0.9 days (independent t-test, p-value=0.050).
Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy has less postoperative pain compared to the cold dissection technique. Additionally, there is less intraoperative blood loss and a reduced incidence of delayed haemorrhage.

 Keywords

chronic tonsillitis; cold dissection; harmonic scalpel; tonsillectomy

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Windfuhr JP, Toepfner N, Steffen G, Waldfahrer F, Berner R. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:989-1009.

Wexler DB. Recovery after tonsillectomy: electro dissection vs. sharp dissection techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114:576-81.

Schmidt R, Herzog A, Cook S, O’Reilly R, Deutsch E, Reilly J. Complications of tonsillectomy: a comparison of techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:925-8.

Haq AU, Bansal C, Pandey AK, Singh VP. Analysis of different techniques of tonsillectomy: an insight. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74(Suppl 3):5717-30.

Wiatrak BJ, Willging JP. Harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope 2002;112(Suppl 100):14-6. doi: 10.1002/lary. 5541121406.

Burton MJ, Doree C. Harmonic scalpel versus other surgical procedures for tonsillectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2017:CD004616.

Nitin B, Gupta M. To compare the effects of post-tonsillectomy intra-operative infiltration of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in tonsillar fossa. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 76:1805-18.

Kloosterman R, Wright GWJ, Salvo-Halloran EM, Ferko NC, Mennone JZ, Clymer JW, et al. An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes. BMC Surg 2023;23:180.

Ankle NR, Yeramalla V, Havaldar RR. Role of pre-incisional bupivacaine infiltration in post-tonsillectomy analgesia. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74:5296-300.

El Shobary M, Salah T, El Nakeeb A, Sultan AM, Elghawalby A, Fathy O, et al. Spray diathermy versus harmonic scalpel technique for hepatic parenchymal transection of living donor. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:321-9.

Kaneyuki D, Patil S, Jackson J, Ahmad D, Plestis KA, Guy TS, et al. Ultrasonic scalpel versus electrocautery for internal mammary artery harvesting: a meta-analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;71:723-9.

Akazawa M, Saito T, Okadome M, Ariyoshi K. Comparison of electrosurgical devices for cervical conization: Novel Monopolar Scalpel (VIO) versus ultrasonic scalpel. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2019;23:43-7.

Collison PJ, Weiner R. Harmonic scalpel versus conventional tonsillectomy: a double-blind clinical trial. Ear Nose Throat J 2004;83:707-10.

Walker R, Syed ZA. Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy. A comparative pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:449-55.

Sood S, Corbridge R, Powles J, Bates G, Newbegin CJ. Effectiveness of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy. Ear Nose Throat J 2001;80:514-8.

Bagherihagh A, Najarzadeh AA, Taheri A, Saeedi M, Hasanalifard M. Comparative study of adult tonsillectomy in two methods: harmonic scalpel and classical surgery. Egypt J Otolaryngol 2023;39:77.

Lachanas VA, Hajiioannou JK, Karatzias GT, Filios D, Koutsias S, Mourgelas C. Comparison of LigaSure vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and cold knife tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:385-9.

Kamal SA, Basu S, Kapoor L, Kulandaivelu G, Talpalikar S, Papasthatis D. Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:449-54.

Alexiou VG, Salazar-Salvia MS, Jervis PN, Falagas ME. Modern technology-assisted vs conventional tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137:558-70.

Wong DJY, Paddle P. Harmonic scalpel versus other techniques for tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust J Otolaryngol 2019;2:3.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241122

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2024

Journal Metrics


2020
Acceptance rate: 52%
2021
Acceptance rate: 27.8%
2022 (March)
Acceptance rate: 15.6%
2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%


Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

About The Authors

Vinay Kumar
Department of Otolaryngology, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College, Ambedkar Nagar, 223225 UP,
India

Surendra Kumar
Department of Anaesthesia, GS Medical College, Pilkhuwa, 245304 UP,
India

Sushil Kumar Sharma
Department of Otolaryngology, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College, Ambedkar Nagar, 223225 UP,
India

Chandra Bhan
Department of Otolaryngology, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College, Ambedkar Nagar, 223225 UP,
India

Rahul Bhargava
Department of Ophthalmology, GS Medical College, Pilkhuwa, 245304 UP,
India

Jitendra Gupta
Department of Otolaryngology, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College, Ambedkar Nagar, 223225 UP,
India

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in



Scopus logo.svg






Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam children computed tomography depression diabetes elderly factors hypertension knowledge mental health mortality prevalence quality of life risk factor risk factors stroke treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems